Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47859 (PNJ)

ISHA v. RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA

COCP/1941/2025 · 2025-04-24

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108 Isha Rajiv Kumar Gupta, IAS CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent 13.12.2024 Court in CWP others”, whereby the respondent was directed to decide the legal notice dated 09.8.2024 withi receipt of certified copy of the order by passing a speaking order necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 17.4.2025 by the present petition. the learned counsel for the respondent COCP-33702-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1941 of 2025 Date of decision : Versus Rajiv Kumar Gupta, IAS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt ceedings against the respondent for non 13.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-33702-2024 titled as “Isha vs. State of Punjab and , whereby the respondent was directed to decide the legal notice dated 09.8.2024 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order by passing a speaking order Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 17.4.2025 by the respondent; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated 17.4.2025 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1941 of 2025 Date of decision :-24.04.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Gursharan Singh, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt non-compliance of order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Isha vs. State of Punjab and , whereby the respondent was directed to decide the legal n a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order by passing a speaking order. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order respondent; thus, no cause survives in the Copy of the aforesaid order dated 17.4.2025 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.25 18.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper book. does not press the present petition any further. April 24, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-33702-2024 Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper- In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.25 18.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document