HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6731/2023 Smt. Prem Devi Agarwal W/o Shri Prakash Chand Agarwal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Agarwal College, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur Range, Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 5. Sho, Police Station Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6236/2024 Jitendra Singh Gurjar Son Of Shri Shivroop Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Motipura, District Gangapur City ( Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Premdevi Wife Of Prakash Chand, Resident Of Near Agrawal College, Gangapur City, District Gangapur City (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/12/2025 (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6731/2023] 1. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.6731/2023 has been submitted by the complainant-petitioner seeking directions to the Investigating Officer for speedy investigation in FIR No.459/2019 registered with Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120-B IPC. While S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.6236/2024 has been submitted by the accused-petitioner-Jitendra Singh Gurjar for quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court of the fact that after investigation, involvement of the accused- petitioner-Jitendra Singh Gurjar has not been found to be proved. Hence, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the accused-petitioner to continue with S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.6236/2024 as the same has become infructuous. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor further apprised this Court that during the course of investigation, the involvement of the complainant-Premdevi has been found to be proved, therefore, she has been treated as accused in the aforesaid FIR. Learned counsel submits that, under these circumstances, the prayer made by the complainant for speedy investigation has also become infructuous as she herself has been found to be involved in the aforesaid FIR as an accused during the course of trial. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by learned Public Prosecutor, both the instant criminal misc. petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. However, the complainant-Premdevi would be at liberty to file appropriate representation, along-with documents, before the (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6731/2023] Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in accordance with law. 6. Stay applications as well as all applications (pending, if any) stand disposed of. 7. Factual report so furnished by the Public Prosecutor is ordered to be retained on the record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/9-10