Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47856 (AP)

Palem Goutham Chandra Kanth v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/5767/2019 · 2025-12-02

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010129902019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5767/2019 Between: 1. PALEM GOUTHAM CHANDRA KANTH, S/O LATE SRI PALEM VENKATA RAO AGE ABOUT 41, RESIDENTS OF D.NO. 1/2617, LIGH, 33-B APHB COLONY, Y.M.PALLE KADAPA. 2. PALEM KRISHNA PRIYA, W/O GOUTHAM CHANDRA KANTH AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF D.NO. 1/2617, LIGH, 33-B APHB COLONY, Y.M.PALLE KADAPA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPTD BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETRIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522503 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KADAPA DISTRICT 516001 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PULIVENDULA KADAPA DISTRICT 516 390 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, LAKKIREDDIPALLE P.S, LAKKIREDDIPALLE MANDAL KADAPA DISTRICT 516 257 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAMAPURAM P.S. RAMAPURAM MANDAL KADAPA DISTRICT 516 175 6. C V RAMANA RAO, S/O C.SUBBARAYUDU AGE ABOUT 57 YEARS, D.NO. 9-170, PANDURANGANAGAR, MOTI NAGAR, ERRAGADDA HYDERABAD CITY 500018 2 7. P BINDU LATHA, W/O C. V.RAMANA RAO AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, D.NO. 9-170, PANDURANGANAGAR, MOTI NAGAR, ERRAGADDA HYDERABAD CITY 500018 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.5/ SI of Police of Ramapuram PS Kadapa District in asking the petitioners especially the 2nd petitioner to go to the police station at the behest of Respondents 6 and 7, for a settlement of civil disputes that are pending between the 1st petitioner and respondents no.6 and 7 and also threatening the petitioners their life property and children with severe consequences in case they fail to go for a settlement of all civil cases that are pending between the petitioners and R6 and R7 and the SI of police asking the petitioners to attend the police station for some enquiry as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentially direct the respondent no.5 not to interfere into civil disputes and civil cases and not to call for the petitioners to the police station for any settlement of civil cases pending between the 1st petitioner and respondents no.6 and 7 and not to interfere into the personal and civil liberties of the petitioners and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.5 not to interfere into civil disputes and civil cases and not to call for the petitioners to the police station for any settlement of civil cases pending between the 1st petitioner and respondents no.6 & 7 and not to interfere into the personal and civil liberties of the petitioners and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 25.04.2019 in W.P No. 5767/2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S S BHATT Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. G V V S VARA PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5767 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri S.S.Bhatt, learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.12.2025 Pmk 4 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5767 OF 2019 Date: 03.12.2025 Pmk