Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47843 (ALL)

KM. SANDHYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A482/35068/2017 · 2025-08-18

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:141029 Court No. - 64 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35068 of 2017 Applicant :- Km. Sandhya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 3. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present. 4. Vide order dated 26.10.2017 notice was issued to the opposite party nos.2 to 4. As per the office report dated 18.08.2025 notice has been served on the opposite party no.2. Despite service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the opposite party nos.2 to 4. 5. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Km. Sandhya with the following prayers: "It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the Order dated 7.10.2017 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Muzaffar Nagar in Misc. case No. 602/11 of 2017 Km. Sandhya versus Monu and others u/s 376D, 452, 506 I.P.C. by which the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant has been rejected or may pass such other and further order with this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the learned court below to reconsider the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant and direct the concerned Police Station to lodge the first information report against the opposite parties otherwise Applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 6. This matter is reported by the office through the report dated 04.08.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be infructuous. 7. Perused the records. 8. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicant to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such. 9. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 10. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week. Order Date :- 19.8.2025 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad