[2025:RJ-JP:47300] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14371/2025 Saroj Boliwal Wife Of Shri Dharmendra Kumar Chahar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Dhani Chaharo Ki, Jyotiba Nagar Chaukri, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Navatala, Panchayat Samiti Patodi (Barmer). 4. Bhagini Nivedita Shiksha Samiti, Head Office- 40, Shiv Shakti Nagar, Ahmadpur, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal (M.p.) Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships' may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition; call for and examine entire record of the case and a)By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof direct the respondents to release the to the petitioner remuneration/salary from March, 2023 to 06.04.2025 with interest @ 12% per annum. [2025:RJ-JP:47300] (2 of 2) [CW-14371/2025] B) Any other order or direction which this Hon 'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /83