[2025:RJ-JP:49140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16957/2025 Mohit Singh Nathawat S/o Shri Achal Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mahaveer Colony, Dudu, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-303008 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Directorate, Bikaner (Raj.) 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghra Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta through VC Ms. Pragya Seth For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “i) the impugned action of the respondents in not considering the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Lecturer (Physical Education) after operating the waiting list in pursuance to the advertisement dated 28.04.2022 may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary on this ground alone; ii) by issuing the writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may be directed a) to operate the waiting list on the post of Lecturer (Physical Education) against the vacant posts in pursuance to the advertisement dated 28.04.2022; [2025:RJ-JP:49140] (2 of 3) [CW-16957/2025] b) to consider the candidature of the humble petitioner for appointment on the post of Lecturer (Physical Education) in pursuance to the advertisement dated 28.04.2022; c) to grant appointment to the humble petitioner on the post of Lecturer (Physical Education) in pursuance to the advertisement dated 28.04.2022 with all consequential benefits; iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is one of the wait listed candidate and the respondents-Department are still carrying on the process by publishing fresh counselling schedule. He also submits that the petitioner has a right to be considered as he has claimed his candidature within six months from the last date of result published by the respondent. 3. Considered submissions of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record. 4. It is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation to the respondents. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through [2025:RJ-JP:49140] (3 of 3) [CW-16957/2025] E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/244