Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47841 (BOM)

SMT. RUPA DADAJI AGALE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY, RURAL DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

WP/3609/2024 · 2025-01-29

Shri Abhay J Mantri, Shri Avinash G Gharote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 49wp3609.2024..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3609 OF 2024 (Smt. Rupa Dadaji Agale and anr Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. G.G. Bade, Advocate for petitioners, Mr. A.M. Kadukar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 /State. CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 29-01-2025 The petition questions the communication dated 2.5.2022, issued by respondent No. 5 expressing its inability to grant employment to the petitioners on compassionate basis as on account of the strength of students available in the institution only two rooms are permissible in terms of GR 11.12.2020. In such circumstances, it is therefore, necessary for respondent No. 5 to reexamine the case of the petitioners and to find out any other vacancy with any other institution in which the petitioners can be accommodated in terms of the GR. The petition is disposed of in above terms. No costs. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Belkhede 2025:BHC-NAG:898-DB