Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47839 (RAJ)

B.L. MEENA SON OF SHRI SHRINARAYAN MEENA v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

CW/16340/2025 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46791] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16340/2025 B.l. Meena Son Of Shri Shrinarayan Meena, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of H-15, Sidhdharth Nagar, Gator, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Registered Office 24, Whites Road, Chennai. 2. Deputy General Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office 8201-202, Shivalik Yash, 2Nd Floor, Shastri Nagar, Brts Bus Stand, Nanagpura, Ahmedabad-380013. 3. Deputy General Manager, United Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Near Bais Godam, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Bansal Mr. Pawa Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) It is therefore prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by appropriate writ order or direction the impugned order of promotion dated 18.09.2021 and 24.05.2022 whereby the case of the petitioner has not been considered and junior persons were promoted to the post of Scale V (Chief Manager) may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondents may further be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for his promotion to the post of Chief Manager (Scale V) against the vacancy of 2021-22 or 2022-23 and after considering the and [2025:RJ-JP:46791] (2 of 2) [CW-16340/2025] promoting the petitioner on the post of Scale V (Chief Manager) the respondent company may also be directed to consider the case of promotion of the petitioner on the subsequent higher posts i.e. Deputy General Manager Scale VI, with all consequential benefits.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /72