PALLAPU VENKATESWARALU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/31281/2023 · 2025-12-09
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47839 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47839 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010605162023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31281/2023 Between:
1. PALLAPU VENKATESWARALU, S/O. ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. EX- SARPANCH,
R/O. D.NO. 2-117, THIMMAYAPALEM, VINUKONDA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VINUKONDA TOWN POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT.
5. MEKA RAJA GOPAL RAO, S/O. SIVA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O. OPP. ICICI BANK, KOTHAPET, LAWYER'S STREET, VINUKONDA, VINUKONDA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT.
6. NAKKA SATTAR REDDY, S/O. NAKKA MASTAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O. KOTHA ODAREVU VILLAGE, BAPATLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue an appropiate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 3 in not taking any action against the Respondent No.4 who are interfering in cheque bounce case
2
between the petitioner and 5th Respondent in CC.No. 441 of 2021 pending on the file of the court of the Junior civil Judge court, Vinukonda, Palnadu District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere in cheque bounce case between the petitioner and 5th Respondent in CC.No. 441 of 2021 pending on the file of the court of the Junior civil Judge court, Vinukonda, Palnadu District”
2. Heard Sri Shaik Meeravali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the police not to interfere in cheque bounce case between the petitioner and unofficial respondents.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in a case where CC.No.441 of 2021 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge Court, Vinukonda, is pending for consideration. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.12.2025 Asr
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.31281 of 2023
Dt.10.12.2025
Asr