IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N IA.No.2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5039 OF 2025 Between: Katikareddy Jagannada Rao, S/o. Veeranna (Late), aged 48 years, Occ; Primary Medical Practitioner (PMP), R/o. H.No. 2-43, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through S.H.O. Mogaltur Police Station, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 2. Smt. Veeravalli Sai Durga, W/o. Sai Krishna, aged 27 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o. D.No. 2-203, Magiletupalem, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. 3. Pithani Raju, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged 48 years, Occ- Agri^lture R/o. D.No. 2-203, Magiletupalem, Kalipatnam East Village, Momitur Mandal, West Godavari District. / ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/AI in C.C. No. 11/2025 on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapur. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt. Veeravalli Sai Durga, W/o. Sai Krishna, aged 27 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o. D.No. 2-203, Magiletupalem, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. Pitham Raju, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged 48 years, Occ- Agriculture ,1 Magiletupalem, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. I ...PETITIONERS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/L.W2 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through S.H.O. Mogaltur Police Station Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. ...1®^ Respondent 2. Katikareddy Jagannada Rao, S/o. Veeranna (Late), aged 48 years Occ: Primary Medical Practitioner (PMP), R/o. H.No. 2-43, Kalipatr^am East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED No.1 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 11/2025 on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapur for the offences punishable under Sections 125 (b) (c) of BNS, R/w. 3 (5) of BNS. praying that in the This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Rambabu Koppineedi, Advocate for the Petitioner Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri N.Siva Ssai Krishna Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 The Court made the following order: and the Public APHC010237952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5039/2025 Between: Katikareddy Jagannada Rao ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent/complalnant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2.NAGURU SIVA SAIKRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: 2 CRL.P. No.5039 OF 2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A. No.2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.5039 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3/de facto complainant and the injured submit that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and have filed I.A. No.2 of 2025, accompanying the affidavits of respondents 2 and 3/ de facto complainant and the injured and the joint memo, seeking the permission of this Court to allow the petitioner and the de facto complainant and the injured to compound the offence under Section 125(b) of the B.N.S. registered against the petitioner and another accused in C.C. No.11 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapur. 2. The petitioner and respondents 2 and 3/de facto complainant and the injured are present in the Court. The parties were identified by the respective counsel and identity cards of both the parties were verified. 3. Respondents 2 and 3 together submit that, pursuant to the intervention of well-wishers, they have withdrawn the allegations made against the petitioner. They further confirmed that the 3 CRL.P. No.5039 OF 2025 Without coercion or undue compromise was reached voluntarily influence. 4. Recording the submissions of 2025 is allowed and the file of the Court of the Additional Narsapur, against the petitioner for respondents 2 and 3, I.A, No.2 of proceedings in C.C. No. 11 of 2025 on the Judicial First Class Magistrate, the offences under Section 125(b) of the B.N.S. are hereby quashed. 5. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Adciitioriai Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapur, W.G. District. 2. One CC to Sri 3. One CC to Sri N. Siva Sai Krishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Rambabu Koppineedi, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public 5. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED;05/05/2025 ORDER IA.No.2 of 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.5039 of 2025 AND«^ e? 10 SEP 2025 mj Pj/ O^ . Current Section ALLOWING THE CRL.P ■ Under Section 359^f BNSS (Section 320 (g) of Cr.P.C) 8s Section 528 of BNSS (Section 482 of Cr.P.C) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADEST ATAMARAVATI I.A.NO. OF 2025 IN CRL.P.NO. OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt. Veeravalli Sai Durga, W/o. Sai Krishna, aged 27 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. D.No. 2-203, Magiletupalem, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. Pithani Raju, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged 48 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 2-203, Magiletupalem, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. .... Petitioners/Defacto Complainant/L.W2 -VERSUS- 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through S.H.O. Mogaltur Police Station, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. ... 1 St Respondent 2. KatikareddyJagannada Rao, S/o. Veeranna (Late), aged 48 years, Occ: Primary Medical Practitioner (PMP), R/o. H.No. 2-43, Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. Respondent/Accused No.l JOINT MEMO / PETITION It is submitted that the complainantsand A1 are residents of Kalipatnam East Village, Mogaltur Mandal, West Godavari District. ATTESTED \} ^ A ■■ - A.G.V. K. SURYARAO NOTARY Appointed by Govt, of A.P AKAN.A.VAPv!THOT/ NARSAPUR - (VIOGALTUP k.% V«^>“ 13 The Complainants complained against the A1 and some other person by name Mogalu Anand Byda, S/o. Kasimpera for grievous injuries due to their negligence act. causing A crime was registered vide FIR. No. 290/2024 under Section 125 (b) (c) of BNS, R/w. Section 3 (5) of BNS of Mogaltur Police Station and Police filed charge sheet against the 2nd Party and another for offences under Section 125 (b) (c) of BNS, R/w. Section 3 (5) of BNS. The learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Narsapur taken cognisance and numbered as C.C.No. 11 of 2025. It is submitted that both the Complainant family and Accused No.l family are residing same place. After the lodging the said Complainants family and other village elders intervened and advised the Complainant and Accused No. 1 family members to settle the disputes. The Complainants voluntarily decided to with the Criminal Proceedings against the Accused No.l. There is no threat or coercion for settlement. So, the Complainants have decided to withdraw the criminal proceedings against the Accused No.l. And whereas during the pendency of the above said cases, the elders of the both sides attempted to clear the differences between the parties but the same prove to futile and the parties herein in the presence of elders and the parties have agreed to settle the issue amicably outside the court and it is mutually agreed by both the parties that, they will compromise the above said case on the following terms and conditions. This matter amicably settled before elders. The Complainant voluntarily decided to with the criminal proceedings against the A.G.V. K. SURYA RAO 2-S NOTARY Appointed by Govt, of A.P AKANAVARITHOT/ NARSAPUR - Ji/iOG.ALTUF <r accused person. There is no threat or coercion for settlement. So, the withdraw the criminal proceedings against Complainant has decided to the Accused No. 1. the affidavit, It is therefore circumstances stated in In these be pleased to Record the C.C. No. prayed that this Hon’ble Court raay and to quash the Criminal proceedings in Compromise 11/2025 on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial First Class offences punishable under Sections 125 such other order or orders as in interest of Justice. Magistrate, Narsapur for the (b) (c) of BNS, R/w. 3 (5) of BNS and pass Honourable Court may deems fit and proper the V. titioners Counsel for P PETITIONERS respondent/Accused Coun^l for Respondent/A1 I I W k. V 'fe'feelRespondent loners Counsel for the P Counsel f rv A.G.U K. SlIRYA RAC 30-tf’- NOTARY Appoint.od by Govt, Qf AKANAVARiTHOT' NARSAPUR - -^OGAL'VU.P W.G.nt., A.P. IHOM “jCT A_ R px,. woGW 9f fN6ffUf,L,X- rtiticste 8? PTaciice -jjd I)!J0 17-12..2927 ^ O, k Oaieo ■ 03-01-2024 a r .P'2-R. • J o:04 h, SL H,. j 2—4 7 ...Page Mo