Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4783 (RAJ)

VIKRAM S/O ROSHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1259/2025 · 2025-05-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20060] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1259/2025 Vikram S/o Roshan, R/o Daulatpura, P.S. Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3206/2025 Vikram Choudhary @ Vikram Dedu S/o Suhkveer, R/o Village Daulatpura, P.S. Sadar Dist. Bundi. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Lal Choudhary For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0445/2024 registered at Police Station-Sadar Bundi, District-Bundi for the offences under Sections 115(2), 332(c) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public [2025:RJ-JP:20060] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1259/2025] Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that as per statement made by the injured-Yashwant during investigation, so called injury caused to the injured- Yashwant was attributed to main accused-Himesh. In pursuance of which, an iron road has been recovered from the possession of the accused-Himesh. Both the petitioners are young and behind the Bar since 13.12.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Vikram S/o Roshan (2) Vikram Choudhary @ Vikram Dedu S/o Suhkveer shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their [2025:RJ-JP:20060] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1259/2025] appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. ( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/25-26