[2025:RJ-JP:43595] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16367/2025 1. Dheeraj Kanwar W/o Govind Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 7, Hanumangali, Chomhala, Gangdhar, District Jhalawar Presently Working As Cook, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Hostel, Chomela, Jhalawar. 2. Shanti Bai W/o Man Singh, R/o 7, Hanumangali, Chomhala, Gangdhar, District Jhalawar Presently Working As Cook, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Hostel, Chomela, Jhalawar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and: A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to regularized services of petitioner on the post of Class-IV Servant/ respondent be directed to decide the petitioners representation on merit as early as possible. B. Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also be passed in favour of petitioners.” [2025:RJ-JP:43595] (2 of 3) [CW-16367/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Dharam Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (Civil Appeal No. 8558/2018) decided on 19.08.2025 by Hon’ble Supreme Court and further relied by a Co-ordinate Bench in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14912/2024 Omprakash & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., order dated 23.09.2025 submits that the present petitioners are working as cook in the respondent department for more than 22 years and they have requested for regularization of their services in wake of direction issued by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Umadevi & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 1. 3. Considering submissions of learned counsel for petitioners, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by affording opportunity of submitting a representation and direction to the respondent(s) to consider and decide the representation in light of judgment in case of Dharam Singh (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the [2025:RJ-JP:43595] (3 of 3) [CW-16367/2025] petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /57