BABULAL SAINI S/O LET GAARSI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5208/2023 · 2025-11-06
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47826 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47826 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5208/2023
1. Babulal Saini S/o Let Gaarsi Lal, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Saini Krashi Farm Sarna Chod, Buudarpura Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Santi Devi W/o Babulal Saini, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Saini Krashi Farm Sarna Chod, Buudarpura Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Yuvraj Singh S/o Babu Lal Saini, Aged About 17 Years, Resident Of Saini Krashi Farm Sarna Chod, Buudarpura Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Through Its Father Shri. Babu Lal Saini, Resident Of Saini Krashi Farm Sarna Chod, Buudarpura Jhptwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Pradeep Kumar Yadav S/o Budhram, R/o 166, Basant Vihar, Niwaru Road Kardhani Jaipur West Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8662/2022 Babulal Saini S/o Let Gaarsi Lal, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Sani Krashi Farm Sarna Chod, Buudarpura Jhotwara Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. The D.g.p, Rajasthan Police, At Lal Kothi Jaipur Rajasthan.
3. Police Commissioner, Jaipur, District Jaipur Rajasthan.
4. S.h.o Kalward, Jaipur District Jaipur Rajasthan.
5. Pradeep Yadav S/o Budram, R/o 166 Basant Vihar, Niwaru Road Jhotwara Jaipur West, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, PP
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5208/2023] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/11/2025 These petitions are lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioners to cure the defect(s). It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting these matters and they have lost interest in pursuing these matter. In view of the above, both the instant criminal misc. petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/237-238