Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:60283
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13815 of 2025 Sarda Chatravani Wd/o Ajay Chatravani Aged About 41 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Milan Chowk, Post - Ranigaon, Ratanpur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Engineer-In-Chief Department Of Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Atal Nagar, Sector 19, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Zone - Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. Superintendent Engineer Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5. Executive Engineer Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.) Division - Mungeli, District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
6. Divisional Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pensions Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
7. Treasury Officer District Treasury Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 13843 of 2025
1. Jayanti Bai Nishad Wd/o Late Shri Vishnu Prasad Nishad Aged About 67 Years R/o Sonkarpara, Rajiv Gandhi Ward, Ward No. 07, Gunderdehi, Balod, District Balod (C.G.)
2. Sushila Bai Wd/o Late Shri Banshi Lal Sahu Aged About 61 Years R/o Kohanga Tola, Sankra J, Balod, District Balod (C.G.)
3. Rekha Yadav Wd/o Late Shri Vimal Kumar Yadav Aged About 57 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Hospital Colony, Chainganj Balod, District Balod (C.G.) SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.12 10:45:33 +0530
2
---Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Engineer-In-Chief Department Of Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.) Atal Nagar, Sector 19, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Zone Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Superintendent Engineer Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Durg Circle Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh
5. Executive Engineer Balod Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.) Department Division Balod District- Balod, Chhattisgarh
6. Divisional Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pensions Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
7. Treasury Officer District Treasury Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 13817 of 2025
1. Shirish Kumar Sahu S/o Sonu Ram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Kukra Post Office Riwa Police Station Mandir Hasoud, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.)
2. Sudha Bai Nayak W/o Late Trinath Nayak Aged About 62 Years R/o House No. 1042, Beside Ram Mandir Shanti Nagar Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.)
3.
Puni Lal Banjare S/o Shri Sarju Prasad Banjare Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Mowa, Post Office Saddu , Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.)
4. Smt. Mankunwar Yadav W/o Late Mukund Ram Yadav Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Nara, Bhansoj Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.)
5. Mohan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Ganga Ram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Tada, Post Office Akoli Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.)
6. Durpati Bai W/o Late Shri Vishnu Mongraj Aged About 62 Years R/o Jal Vihar Colony Telibandha Raipur Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Water Resources Department , Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
2. The Executive Engineer Water Resources Department Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.)
3
3. The Joint Director, Treasury Accounts And Pension, Raipur Division District- Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kulesh Sahu and Mr. Anmol Sharma, PL 11/12/2025
1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022). 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge santosh