NAND KISHORE S/O LATE SHRI MOHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5843/2020 · 2025-10-30
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47822 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47822 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43482] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5843/2020 Nand Kishore S/o Late Shri Mohanlal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o House No. 102, Lal Basti Bayana, P.s. Bayana, District Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor
2. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Mohanlal, R/o Rang Bhariyo Ki Gali, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal Ms. Bhanwari Kumari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 30/10/2025
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing the FIR No. 254/2020 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Alwar for offence under Section 366 of IPC, which was lodged by the father of the victim.
2. In the FIR, it has been alleged that the petitioner has kidnapped daughter of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such incident has ever taken place. The victim was major at the relevant time and she has voluntarily gone with the petitioner solely for the purpose of performing marriage as her parents were not agreed to the proposal of marriage of victim with the petitioner. Later on, petitioner and
[2025:RJ-JP:43482] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5843/2020] victim have performed marriage and in proof thereof copy of registration certificate dated 22.09.2020 has been placed on record. Thus, the fact is that the petitioner and the daughter of the complainant have been living happily as husband and wife and even children have born out of their wedlock.
3.
Learned counsel for the complainant has not disputed the said facts and has rather revealed that after lodging the FIR and during the pendency of the criminal misc. petition, compromise has taken place between the complainant and the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant, on instructions, submits that the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner in the light of aforesaid facts.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has also not opposed the petition in view of the facts stated hereinabove.
5. Looking to the facts that now the petitioner is also member of family of the complainant, this Court deems it just and proper to exercise inherent power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. FIR No. 254/2020 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana is hereby quashed and set-aside.
6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/38