Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47819 (MAD)

CHOCKALINGAM v. ARULMIGU SIVAN TEMPLE

AS/259/2022 · 2025-07-16

G Jayachandran

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A.S.No.259 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN A.S.No.259 of 2022 Chockalingam .. Appellant Vs. 1.Arulmigu Sivan Temple Represented by its Founder & Trustee Pappu Gounder Sembodai Village, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. Pappur Gounder (Died) 2.Sivalingam 3.Pasupathi 4.Kailasam 5.Govindarajan 6.Palaniappan 7.Kandasamy 8.Sargunam 9.Rameshkanna 10.Ramachandiran 11.Kanagarajan 12.Somasundaram 13.Thiyagarajan 14.Govindaraj 15.Ramamoorthy .. Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.259 of 2022 PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to allow the appeal by setting aside the Judgment and Decree dated 30.11.2021 passed in O.S.No.04 of 2012 on the file of the District Court, Nagapattinam. For Appellant : Mr.S.Senthil For R2 : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan For R3 to R10, R13 & R15 : No appearance JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the appellant has settled the dispute with the respondent out of Court and is not interested in pursuing the appeal. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Appeal Suit stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shal be no order as to costs. 16.07.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rpl 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.259 of 2022 To 1.The District Court, Nagapattinam. 2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai. DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.259 of 2022 rpl A.S.No.259 of 2022 16.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis