Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47816 (RAJ)

SHASHI KANTA D/O BAHADAR CHAND W/O AMIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18448/2025 · 2025-11-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48344] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18448/2025 Shashi Kanta D/o Bahadar Chand W/o Amit Kumar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Soni Market, Block Jaitsar, Tehsil And District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Sriganganagar. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sriganganagar. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Anupgarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to grant salary and allowances and notional [2025:RJ-JP:48344] (2 of 3) [CW-18448/2025] benefits and other service benefits to Petitioner as given to the candidates who selected/appointed for the post of Teacher Gr. III. (ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give all service benefit/promotion/notional benefits as given in the case of Rajni Koli Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. SBCWP NO. 8153/2025 decided on 13.10.2025 (Annex. 3). (iii)Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner. (iv) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioner..” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 18.03.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.120/2025 submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court in case of Manoj Khandelwal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. SB CWP No.7283/2014 (order dated 16.07.2014). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG accepts notice of behalf of respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ [2025:RJ-JP:48344] (3 of 3) [CW-18448/2025] petition is disposed of in light of order dated 18.03.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.120/2025 of this Court and order dated 16.07.2014 in case of Manoj Khadelwal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /132