Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47811 (ALL)

SATENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT NIGAM AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/17400/2022 · 2025-09-17

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17400 of 2022 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Sri Udai Chandani, learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions, submits that due to subsequent events, this writ petition has become infructuous, therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. Sri Dharmendra Dhar Dubey, learned counsel for respondents has no objection if such prayer is considered. 3. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 18, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Udai Chandani Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, C.S.C., Dharmendra Dhar Dubey, Sarveshwar Lal Srivastava, U.S. Singh Visen (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Satendra Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) U.P. State Road Transport Nigam And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad