318 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA JASPREET SINGH SIDHU @ KALU STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Ms. Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu Mr. Rishabh Singla, Mr. Ajay Singh Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. 16.02.2023, registered under Sections Police Station City Rampura subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 15.04.2025 2. The IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: JASPREET SINGH SIDHU @ KALU V/S PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ajay Singh Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. registered under Sections 452, 323, 380 of Indian Penal Code at City Rampura District Bathinda, Punjab (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise .04.2025 (Annexure P-2). The following order was passed on “This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the No.31 dated 16.02.2023, registered under Sections of IPC registered at Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda, Punjab (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21055-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Singh Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.2. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No.31 dated 452, 323, 380 of Indian Penal Code at Bathinda, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise following order was passed on 21.05.2025 :- petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR , registered under Sections 452, 323, 380 of IPC registered at Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda, Punjab (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21055-2025 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh is allowed and 323, 380 of Indian Penal Code at 2025 2 proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise 15.04.2025 (Annexure P2). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Godara, Addl. AG Punjab, accepts notice on No.1-State and Mr. Ajay Singh Pundir for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney and admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intim are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 21.07.2025. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No.31 dated 16.02.2023, registered under Sections 323, 380 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station on the basis of compromise dated , on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash accepts notice on behalf of respondent Ajay Singh Pundir, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney and admits to se. Copy of the paper book be supplied to In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition , registered under Sections 452, Police Station City Rampura District HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21055-2025 Bathinda, Punjab (Annexure P out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioner July 21, 2025 himanshu (i) (ii) 2025 3 Bathinda, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all consequentia out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable consequential proceedings arising . HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document