[2025:RJ-JP:40387] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 149/2015 1. Dwarika Chaudhary Daughter of Prahlad Chaudhary, age 22 years, Resident of Dhani Jeevandas, Village Post Mendwas, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. 2. Atul Kumar Swami Son of Hardyal Swami, age 30 years, Resident of Village Post Mendwas, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Prahlad Chaudhary son of Ramjeevan, Resident of Dhani Jeevandas, Village Post Mendwas, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. 2. Station House Officer/Officer in Charge of Police Station, Police Station: Phagi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dudu, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur. 4. Additional Superintendent of Police, (Jaipur Rural), ASP Office, Near Sadar Police Station, Railway Station, Jaipur. 5. Superintendent of Police, (Jaipur Rural), ASP Office, Near Sadar Police Station, Railway Station, Jaipur. 6. Inspector General of Police, I.G. Office, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur. 7. Additional Director General of Police (Law and Order), Rajasthan Police, Jaipur. 8. Director General of Police, Rajasthan Police, Police Headquarter, Tonk Road, Opposite Nehru Garden, Jaipur. 9. Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur. 10. Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur. 11. Collector District Jaipur, Collectorate, Jaipur. 12. Ramesh Son of Bhagwan Kumawat resident of Village Nareda Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur 13. Ram Raj, Son of Akheram Jat, resident of Village Mendwas, Tehsil Phagi, Jaipur. 14. Hansraj, Son of Ramji Lal Jat, resident of Village Mendwas, Tehsil Phagi, Jaipur. 15. Jeet Ram, Son of Jai Singh Jat, resident of Village [2025:RJ-JP:40387] (2 of 3) [CRLW-149/2015] Mendwas, Tehsil Phagi, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashodhar Tolani for Mr. Rajat Ranjan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma & Mr. Anutosh Mishra for Mr. Ashvin Garg Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/10/2025 1. This criminal writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the contention that both the petitioners, after attaining age of majority, performed marriage on 08.05.2015 and marriage registration certificate issued by the competent authority has also been placed on record as Annexure-4. It is submitted that on account of pre-conceived disliking, their parents were not happy with their marriage and therefore, the petitioners were facing life threats. Hence, protection was sought in the light of provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as well as in view of directions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. reported in 2006 (5) SCC 475. 2. This Court vide order dated 26.05.2015 directed the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the married life of petitioners. It is stated that for last 10 years, the petitioners have been enjoying their happy married life and even children have also born out of their wedlock. [2025:RJ-JP:40387] (3 of 3) [CRLW-149/2015] 3. In view of above and looking to the fact that 10 years have been passed since marriage of the petitioners, this criminal writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the petitioners that in case, they still have any apprehension with regard to threat to their life, they may file representation before respondent No.2, who after examination of the contents of the representation, if finds any reasonable threat precepts against the petitioners, will take action in accordance with law. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /57