MAHESH S/O BABARAO PATHRIKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO PS TELHARA TAH.TELHARA DIST.AKOLA AND ANOTHER
REVN/55/2024 · 2025-01-13
Urmila Joshi Phalke
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47782 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47782 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 42-revn-55-24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Revision (REVN) No. 55 of 2024 Mahesh S/o Babarao Pathrikar Versus State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Telhare, Tah. Telhare, District Akola and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri Nikhil R. Tekade, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Sneha Dhote, APP for the non-applicant/State. Shri A.B.Mirza, Advocate for the non-applicant no.2.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2025. By this application, the applicant is challenging the order dated 16th December, 2023 passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge, Akot (Special Judge, under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act) rejecting the discharge application of the present applicant.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant to some extent.
3. Perused the entire charge-sheet and the material collected during the investigation. SKNair
2 42-revn-55-24.odt
4. I have shown disinclination to interfere with the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the revision application.
5. Criminal Revision application is disposed of as withdrawn.
[URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.] SKNair