Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47779 (RAJ)

SURENDRA SHARMA S/O SHRI GANPATRAM SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5326/2021 · 2025-10-27

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43049] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5326/2021 1. Surendra Sharma S/o Shri Ganpatram Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village- Sundar Mahal Resort, N.h-8, Mohaladiya Police Thana Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 2. Savita W/o Shri Surendra Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village- Sundar Mahal Resort, N.h-8, Mohaladiya Police Thana Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Rajesh S/o Gopal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Sahbajpur Nangal, Tehsil Baval, District Rewari, Haryana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 27/10/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner against order dated 31.10.2019, whereby cognizance has been taken by trial Court against the petitioner under Section 504 & 506 of IPC, which was unsuccessfully challenged by them before the revisional Court and the revision petition has also been dismissed on 03.08.2021. 3. The aforesaid petition was filed by the petitioner on 25.08.2021. However, despite lapse of more than four years, no [2025:RJ-JP:43049] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5326/2021] steps have been taken by the petitioner to cure the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry. 4. In view of above, when nobody is there to represent the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue the instant criminal miscellaneous petition and the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /77