Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47773 (AP)

B.Adinarayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WA/1219/2025 · 2025-11-18

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010623662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1219/2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent to declare the order passed by the learned single, Judge in W.P.No. 31225/2025 dated 11.11.2025 is as illegal, arbitrary , contrary to law and clear violation of Article 14 , 16 of Constitution of India and violation of principles of natural justice and further direct the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer without reference to the charge memo issued vide G.O.Rt.No. 682 dated 13.09.2022 of the 1st respondent Between: 1. B.ADINARAYANA, S/O YANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PH), PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, RESERVOIR COMPOUND, COURT ROAD, ANANTHAPUR-515001. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, STATE OF A.P., PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 pleased to grant permission to the petitioner to file Additional material papers for kind consideration of this Hon’ble court, interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer without reference to the charge Memo issued vide G.O.Rt.No. 682 dated 13.09.2022 of the 1st respondent Counsel for the Appellant: 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL No.1219 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Learned counsel for the Appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date: 19.11.2025 SCS 4 53 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL No.1219 of 2025 Dt.19.11.2025 SCS