Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4777 (UTT)

FIROZ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/566/2025 · 2025-05-22

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.566 of 2025 Firoz ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Ms. Ruhani Sahani, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 01 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Pathri, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that in all case, based on which, instant FIR has been lodged, the applicant is on bail and in one case he was given notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”). 4. Learned State counsel would submit that in one case, which is Case Crime No. 562 of 2022, Police Station Laksar, the applicant is not on bail. It is a case pertaining to theft. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that in this Case Crime No. 562 of 2022, the applicant has been served with notice under Section 41 A of the Code in this matter. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 22.05.2025 Jitendra