Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38107] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10226/2025
1. Kishore Lal S/o Shri Ramdev, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kotha Ki Dhani, Sarwad, Police Station Sarwad, Ajmer. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).
2. Ramprasad S/o Dhanna, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhasu, Police Station Todaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.D. Dadhich Mr. Dikshant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakhad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/09/2025
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicants-accused Kishore Lal S/o Shri Ramdev and Ramprasad S/o Dhanna seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.219/2025 dated 18.05.2025 registered at P.S. Nasirabad Sadar District - Ajmer, for the offence under Sections 331(4), 305(A) of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more
[2025:RJ-JP:38107] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10226/2025] required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that an unnamed report is registered by complainant for theft in the temple and during investigation, present petitioners are identified, who entered in temple with other co-accused and committed theft. He further submitted that recovery is not sufficient to show that present petitioners are involved in the incident. He further submitted that other co-accused were granted bail by the trial court and charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioners.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.
6. On the basis of complaint lodged by Deepu about theft from Dev Narayan Temple on 08.05.2025, the matter is registered and investigated. During investigation, petitioner Kishore Lal and Ram Prasad were identified and certain recoveries were effected. As per material on record 5 criminal cases were registered against Kishore Lal and three against Ram Prasad.
[2025:RJ-JP:38107] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10226/2025] These accused were continuously involved in committing burglary particularly at religious places and sometime such incident results in tension between the communities.
7. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicants is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicants in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicants accused on bail.
8. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicants accused at this stage.
9. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by Kishore Lal S/o Shri Ramdev and Ramprasad S/o Dhanna is hereby dismissed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /135