APHC010264312021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16330/2021 Between: 1. CHALLA VENKATA SURESH BABU, S/O. SESHAIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION R/O. NANDANAVANAM VILLAGE ZARUGUMALLI MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARATE VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTURU DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDING OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDING OF POLICE, ONGOLE DIVISION ONGOLE TOWN AND CORPORATION PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. SWARNA PRASAD, S/O. BALARAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, FLOOR MILL OWNER R/O. 1ST LINE, BALARAMAIAH THOTA KOVURU ROAD KANDUKUR TOWN PRAKASAM DISTRICT 5. SWARNA RAMESH BABU ROSAIAH, S/O. SUBBA RAO, HINDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, Y.C.P. POLITICAL LEADER, R/O. NANDANAVANAM VILLAGE ZARUGUMALLI MANDAL ,PRAKASAM DISTRICT 6. NEPPALI RAVI, S/O. VENKAIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NETHIVARIPALEM VILLAGE KONDAPI MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ petition or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action the 3rd to 6th respondents herein with the support of 4th respondent to return the said advance amount of Rs.15,00,000/- at Kandukur Town and Municipality in Prakasam District. The 4th respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary and violating of article 14 and 300-A of the constitution of India, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd to 6th respondents to do not call the petitioner and repay the amount of Rs.15,00,000/- as the case is civil nature, the 3rd respondent interference in this matter not advisable. Pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH NAGENDRA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16330/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ petition or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action the 3rd to 6th respondents herein with the support of 4th respondent to return the said advance amount of Rs.15,00,000/- at Kandukur Town and Municipality in Prakasam District. The 4th respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary and violating of article 14 and 300-A of the constitution of India, and pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent police never demanded the petitioner for money. He would further submit that the police never interfered in the matter, since the matter is of civil in nature and never called the petitioner to police station. 4. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16330 of 2021 Dated.24.09.2025 UPS 219