Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47759 (RAJ)

BHASKAR SHARMA S/O SHRI MAN MOHAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18186/2025 · 2025-11-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47801] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18186/2025 Bhaskar Sharma S/o Shri Man Mohan Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o A-13, Hida Ki Mori, Galta Road, Jaipur. At Present Working As Cls (Divisional Assistant) At The Office Of Project Director, Rajasthan State Aids Control Society, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General, National Aids Control Organization, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Government Of India, New Delhi. 3. Deputy Secretary To Government Of India, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, National Aids Control Organization, New Delhi. 4. Mission Director, Nhm And Ex-Officio Joint Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 5. Project Director, Rajasthan State Aids Control Society, Jaipur 6. Divisional Assistant / Data Entry Assistant, (Establishment Section), Rajasthan State Aids Control Society, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:47801] (2 of 3) [CW-18186/2025] “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 04.09.2025 may kindly be modified and the respondents may kindly be directed to change the petitioner’s post nomenclature as ‘Computer Literature Steno’ and accordingly he be granted remuneration, as admissible for the said post, under CSR. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9950/2025 Jitendra Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:47801] (3 of 3) [CW-18186/2025] petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /126