APHC010508412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26633/2025 Between: 1. INAPAKURTHI ANANDARAO, , S/O.SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.15-1-8, VELAMA VEEDHI, ARASAVILLI, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR1, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. KURAKULA SRINIVASARAO, S/O.LATE SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.9-4-64, GUDI VEEDHI,SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not taking further steps for cancellation of the self made sale deeds vide document No. 19363/2024 and document No. 19364/2024 dt. 12.08.2024 created by the 4th respondent having contemplated enquiry pursuant to the notice dt.22.03.2025 is as illegal arbitrary highhanded and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to provision of Registration Act, 1908 and its rules and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take further steps for cancellation of the converted sale deeds vide document No. 19363/2024 and document No. 19364/2024 dt. 12.08.2024 made by the 4th respondent in respect of the petitioners land an extent of Ac.0.16 cents covered by T.S.No.414-1, RSR No.496-1 of Srikakulam Town pursuant to the notice dt.22.03.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take further steps for cancellation of the converted sale deeds vide document No. 19363/2024 and document No. 19364/2024 dt. 12.08.2024 made by the 4'^ respondent in respect of the petitioner’s land an extent of Ac.0.16 cents covered by T.S.No.414-1, RSR No.496-1 of Srikakulam Town pursuant to the notice dt.22.03.2025 issued by the 2"^ respondent, pending writ petition before the Hon’ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.26633 of 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…issue Writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not taking further steps for cancellation of the self made sale deeds vide document No. 19363/2024 and document No. 19364/2024 dt. 12.08.2024 created by the 4th respondent having contemplated enquiry pursuant to the notice dt.22.03.2025 is as illegal arbitrary highhanded and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to provision of Registration Act, 1908 and its rules and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take further steps for cancellation of the converted sale deeds vide document No. 19363/2024 and document No. 19364/2024 dt. 12.08.2024 made by the 4th respondent in respect of the petitioners land an extent of Ac.0.16 cents covered by T.S.No.414-1, RSR No.496-1 of Srikakulam Town pursuant to the notice dt.22.03.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and pass…” 2. Respondents issued notice dated 22.03.2025 to the petitioner herein to attend inquiry with relevant records. Assailing the said notice, the present writ petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice if the Court directs the concerned respondent to consider the explanation dated 07.02.2025 which was submitted in response to the notice dated 21.01.2025. He request this Court to direct the concerned respondent to examine the explanation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. 4. In view of the above submission, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondent No.2 to examine the explanation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.09.2025 TVN 227 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.26633 OF 2025 Date: 25.09.2025 TVN