121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AMARJIT SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Deepak Vashishta, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Arora, for the petitioner. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under seeking directions to official respondent Nos.1 to 3 petitioner on account of complaints filed by respondent No.5 and to comply with the provisions of Section 160 representation dated 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that dispute, the private respondents in connivance with the police are harassing the petitioner by filing false and frivolous complaints. He further submits that the petitioner has filed a civil suit qua the land in dispute and interim injunction has also been granted in his favour, however, the private respondents, with the help of police are land in dispute. In this regard, the petitioner has also filed a contempt petition before learned Civil Court, Jalandhar on 29.03.2025. respondent No.5 has also filed a petition before District Devel Panchayat Office IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AMARJIT SINGH V/S PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Deepak Vashishta, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under seeking directions to official respondent Nos.1 to 3 petitioner on account of complaints filed by respondent No.5 and to comply with the provisions of Section 160 Cr.P.C. and further prayer is to look into representation dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) moved to Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents in connivance with the police are harassing by filing false and frivolous complaints. He further submits that the petitioner has filed a civil suit qua the land in dispute and interim injunction has also been granted in his favour, however, the private , with the help of police are interfering land in dispute. In this regard, the petitioner has also filed a contempt petition before learned Civil Court, Jalandhar on 29.03.2025. respondent No.5 has also filed a petition before District Devel Panchayat Officer-Cum-Collector, Jalandhar against the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22103-2025 Date of decision: 28.04.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Deepak Vashishta, Advocate and Prayer in the present petition filed under 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking directions to official respondent Nos.1 to 3 to not to harass the petitioner on account of complaints filed by respondent No.5 and to comply and further prayer is to look into ) moved to respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some land the private respondents in connivance with the police are harassing by filing false and frivolous complaints. He further submits that the petitioner has filed a civil suit qua the land in dispute and interim injunction has also been granted in his favour, however, the private interfering in the construction on the land in dispute. In this regard, the petitioner has also filed a contempt petition before learned Civil Court, Jalandhar on 29.03.2025. He further submits that respondent No.5 has also filed a petition before District Development and Collector, Jalandhar against the petitioner, in order to MANISHA 2025.04.28 18:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-22103 harass him, whereby, vide order dated 01.04.2025, the parties were directed to maintain status quo. 28.03.2025 to respondent No.2, 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P petitioner, in a time bound manner. 4. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 5. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners is dir State counsel today itself. 6. Keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to r representation (Annexure P steps in view of the submissions made therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, April 28, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 22103-2025 2 , whereby, vide order dated 01.04.2025, the parties were directed to maintain status quo. The petitioner has submitted espondent No.2, but no action was taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P in a time bound manner. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned State counsel today itself. Keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner and take appropriate steps in view of the submissions made therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable , whereby, vide order dated 01.04.2025, the parties were directed to submitted a representation dated but no action was taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-4) submitted by the Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for ected to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned Keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioners and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed espondent No.2 to consider and decide the ) submitted by the petitioner and take appropriate steps in view of the submissions made therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.28 18:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment