Page No.1 of 4 IN MCC-1187-2025 2025:CGHC:59197-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1187 of 2025 1 - Pemendra Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Kalindra Singh Thakur Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kokawada, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Legal Heir Of Kalindra Singh Thakur, And Smt. Neelandri, Who Were Arrayed As Defendant No. 1 And Defendant No. 1(A) Respectively Before The Ld. Trial Court They Died During Pendency Of Suit And The Ld. Trial Court Deleted Their Name From The Cause Title) (Defendant No. 1(B) 2 - Roshan Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Kalindra Singh Thakur Aged About 42 Years R/o Haatkachora, Bastar Regional Gramin Bank, Near Head Office, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Legal Heir Of Kalindra Singh Thakur, And Smt. Neelandri, Who Were Arrayed As Defendant No. 1 And Defendant No. 1(A) Respectively Before The Ld. Trial Court They Died During Pendency Of Suit And The Ld. Trial Court Deleted Their Name From The Cause Title) (Defendant No. 1(C) 3 - Balram Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Kalindra Singh Thakur Aged About 40 Years R/o Haatkachora, Bastar Regional Gramin Bank, Near Head Office, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Legal Heir Of Kalindra Singh Thakur, And Smt. Neelandri, Who Were Arrayed As Defendant No. 1 And Defendant No. 1(A) Respectively Before The Ld. Trial Court They Died During Pendency Of Suit And The Ld. Trial Court Deleted Their Name From The Cause Title) (Defendant No. 1(D) 4 - Smt. Hemlata Thakur W/o Shri Uttam Singh Thakur Aged About 37 Years R/o Near Panchayat Bhawan, Village Tetarkhuti, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Legal Heir Of Kalindra Singh Thakur, And Smt. Neelandri, Who Were Arrayed As Defendant No. 1 And Defendant No. 1(A) Respectively Before The Ld. Trial Court They Died During Pendency Of Suit And The Ld. SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Page No.2 of 4 IN MCC-1187-2025 Trial Court Deleted Their Name From The Cause Title) (Defendant No. 1(E) 5 - Bindi D/o Late Shri Kalindra Singh Thakur Aged About 35 Years R/o Kokawada, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Legal Heir Of Kalindra Singh Thakur, And Smt. Neelandri, Who Were Arrayed As Defendant No. 1 And Defendant No. 1(A) Respectively Before The Ld. Trial Court They Died During Pendency Of Suit And The Ld. Trial Court Deleted Their Name From The Cause Title) (Defendant No. 1(F) ... Applicant Versus 1 - Smt. Sonmani D/o Late Shri Balbhadra Singh Thakur Aged About 79 Years R/o Santoshi Ward Jagdalpur, District Bastar Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Dilip Singh Thakur S/o Shri Laltab Singh Thakur, R/o Santoshi Ward Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Lalita W/o Late Shri Harendra Singh Thakur Aged About 56 Years R/o D.M.O. Office Near Old Collector Office Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 2) 3 - Smt. Dhanmati W/o Late Onkar Singh Thakur Aged About 29 Years R/o Hatkachora, Bastar Regional Gramin Bank Near Head Office Jagdalppur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 3 In The Suit Onkar Singh Thakur Died During Pendency Of The Suit. His Name Was Deleted And His Legal Heir Smt. Dhanmati Was Arrayed As Defendant No. 3(A) In The Cause Title Before The Trial Court) (Defendant No. 3(A) 4 - Pawan Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Harendra Singh Thakur Aged About 26 Years R/o D.M.O. Office Near Old Collector Office Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhatttisgarh (Defendant No. 4) 5 - Smt. Kalavati Thakur D/o Late Shri Harendra Thakur Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Titar Gaon, Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 5) 6 - Jeeran S/o Shri Harihar Singh Thakur Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 6) 7 - Bhupendra Singh Thakur S/o Shri Harihar Singh Thakur Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 7) Page No.3 of 4 IN MCC-1187-2025 8 - Smt. Vedvati W/o Shri Jyotendra Singh Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 8) 9 - Smt. Satyavati W/o Late Shri Gajendra Singh Thakur Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 9) 10 - Lokendra Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Gajendra Singh Thakur Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 10) 11 - Lokesh Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Gajendra Singh Thakur Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 11) 12 - Hitendra Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Gajendra Singh Thakur Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Netanar, Tahsil Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 12) 13 - Smt. Tara W/o Shri Vijay Singh Thakur Aged About 45 Years R/o Main Road Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 13) 14 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bastar Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 14) ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicants : Mr. Sunder Lal Sahu, Advocate For Non-applicant/State: Mr. Ashish Shukla, Addl. Advocate General ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 05.12.2025 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application filed under Section 05 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 59 day in filing the present restoration application (MCC). 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, we are of the considered opinion that the applicant has shown sufficient cause in Page No.4 of 4 IN MCC-1187-2025 filing this restoration application (MCC) with a delay of 59 day and, accordingly, the same is liable to be condoned. 3. Consequently, the delay of 59 day in filing this restoration application (MCC) is hereby condoned. IA No.01 is allowed. 4. Also heard on admission. 5. The application being arguable is admitted for hearing. 6. Issue notice to the non-applicant. Mr. Ashish Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the non-applicant/State accepts notice. 7. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 8. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of FA-198-2023, which was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 04.08.2025. 9. Since it has been submitted on behalf of the applicant that order dt. 04.08.2025 has already been complied with by filing paper- book in FA-198-2023 and for the reasons stated in the application (MCC), the same is allowed. Consequently, FA-198-2023 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 10. Accordingly, the MCC allowed. No cost. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge s@if