PINKI YADAV D/O SHRI RAM CHAND YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WMAP/444/2025 · 2025-11-01
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47744 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47744 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43798] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.444/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17418/2016
1. Pinki Yadav D/o Shri Ram Chand Yadav, Village Post Rundal, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Krishna Yadav D/o Shri Bhagwan Sahai Yadav, Kale Pahari, Charanwas, Tehsil Jamuwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Sunita Yadav D/o Shri Ram Gopal Yadav, Nangal Tulsi Das, Tehsil Jamuwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Naresh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Gokul Chand Sharma, Molahera, Tehsil Kotputli District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Services Selection Board Durgapura, Jaipur.
2. Registrar, Rajasthan Para Medical Council, G-1, Kishan Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3. Registrar, NIIMS University, Rajasthan, Shobha Nagar, Jaiopur Delhi Highway, Jaipur-303121.
4. Director (Adm.) Medical & Health Department Govt. of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini with Dr. Soniya Saini & Mr. Abhishek Saini Mr. Achintya Kaushik For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
[2025:RJ-JP:43798] (2 of 2) [WMAP-444/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 01/11/2025
1. This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the
learned counsel for the petitioners stating therein that on 08.09.2025, Mr. Bharat Saini, learned counsel & Mr. Achintya Kaushik, learned counsel were present in the Court and argued the matter on behalf of the respondents, however, on account of inadvertence, their names are not reflected in judgment dated
08.09.2025.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and it is clarified that Mr. Bharat Saini, learned counsel & Mr. Achintya Kaushik, learned counsel were present in the Court and argued the matter on behalf of the respondents.
3. Accordingly, the present Miscellaneous Application stands disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH-GARIMA/19