APHC010625052014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34894/2014 Between: 1. MISS. NACHU LAKSHMI MANOJNA,, D/O. N. DURGA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. 15-15/5, NACHUVARI CENTER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, AIWAN-E-GALIB MARG, KOTLA ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 002, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. DRS SUDHA NAGESWARA RAO, SIDHARTHA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCE CHINAOUTPALLI, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL. 4. VISHNU DENTAL COLLEGE, VISHNUPUR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring Proceedings No. CE-114-2013/12104, Dt. 17.12.2013 issued by the 1st respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner for migration from 3rd respondent college to 4th respondent college as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and set-aside the same consequently direct the 1st respondent to transfer the petitioner from the 3rd respondent college 2 to 4th respondent college to appear for the ensuing 2nd year BDS course and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 43658 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1st respondent to transfer the petitioner from the 3rd respondent college to 4th respondent college to appear for the ensuing 2nd year BDS, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUDARSHAN MALUGARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings dated 17.12.2013 issued by the 1st respondent, whereby the petitioner’s application for migration from the 3rd respondent college to the 4th respondent college was rejected. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Since the issue pertains to EAMCET Examinations of the academic year 2011–2012, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 17th September, 2025 cbn 4 202 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.34894 of 2014 17th September, 2025 cbn