Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4774 (JHR)

BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH ALIAS BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. MR. RAVI RAJ SHARMA, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

Cont.(Cvl)/329/2025 · 2025-07-11

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:19004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (civil) No. 329 of 2025 --------- 1. Birendra Kumar Singh @ Birendra Kumar Singh, aged about 68 years, son of Late Rajeshwar Singh, resident of Ratshar Kalan, Ballia, Post Ballia, Police Station Ballia, District Ballia, Uttar Pradesh. 2. Santosh Kumar Choudhary, aged about 68 years, son of Late Bhagwat Narayan Choudhary, residing Near Hindu Mission Road, Radhey Nagar, MADA Colony, Post Dhanbad, Police Station Dhanbad, District Dhanbad. 3. Bhai Chandanand Ji @ Bhai Chandranand Jee, aged about 70 years, son of Bhai Paramanand Jee, resident of Kanudih, Post Kanudih, Police Station Kanudih, District Bhojpur, Bihar. 4. Devnandan Prasad Ray @ Deonandan Prasad Roy, aged about 68 years, son of Late Varun @ Barun Prasad Roy, resident of village Baradaha, Post Birajpur, Police Station Palojori, District Deoghar. ....Petitioner (s) Versus 1. Mr. Ravi Raj Sharma, son of not known to the petitioners, presently posted as the Managing Director, Mineral Area Development Authority officiating from Lubi Circular Road, Hirapur, Post Hirapur, Police Station Hirapur, District Dhanbad ….. Contemnor/ Opposite Party 2. The State of Jharkhand …. Respondents/ Proforma Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samavesh Bhanj Deo, Adv. For the Opposite Party (s) : Mr. Kumar Pawan, A.C.to S.C.-III --------- 03/11.07.2025 It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioners that the order has been complied. 2. Accordingly, contempt application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amardeep/-