Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47737 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR TYAGI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/1549/2025 · 2025-07-09

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111393 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1549 of 2025 Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Tyagi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vipin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. This application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.4587 of 2024 (State Vs. Vinod & Others) arising out of case crime no.310 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 260 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Muzaffar Nagar pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the informant of this case. The matter is pending at the stage of hearing on the point of charge. Since the charges have not been framed so far against the accused persons, the case is pending unnecessarily and the accused persons are not cooperating with the trial. The case pertains to the year 2024. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all efforts to procure the appearance of the accused and to pass an order on the point of framing of the charge in this case as per law within a period of two months from today and if the charges are framed, all endeavours shall be made by it for the expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case, keeping in view the work load in the said Court, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 / ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad