Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47736 (ALL)

NAGRENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/13547/2025 · 2025-05-20

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86086 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13547 of 2025 Applicant :- Nagrendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anoop Kumar Pandey,Sarthak Singh,Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard Shri Sarthak Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Nagendra Singh, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 78 of 2025, under Sections 3/5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, Police Station- Paniyara, District- Maharajganj. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 16.03.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the recovery shown from the possession of the applicant is planted one. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly placed co-accused, namely, Imarti Devi and Radha, have been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13148 of 2025 and 12943 of 2025, vide orders dated 07.05.2025 and 12.05.2025. The applicant has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Narendra Singh, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Deepak/ Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad