Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010168782020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10639/2020 Between:
1. KOLLIPARA RAMA CHANDRA RAO, FATHER NAME. VENKATA DRISHNA RAO, AGE. 65, REP BY HIS REGISTERED GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, PASUPULETI SANKARAYYA, S/O. PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O.
D.NO. 16-3-32, M.V.AGRAHARAM, TRUNK ROAD, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MANUBOLU MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare , the action of the Respondents trying to dispossess the Petitioner from his possession of Agriculture land in an extent of Ac. 3.66 Cents in Sy.No. 23/2 , Manubolu village and Mandal, Nellore District under the program of
2
Navaratnalu for allotment of house sites without issuing any acquisition notification or followed due process of law as directed by this Honourable Court in W.P.No. 4885 of 2008, dated 26-11-2019 is illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Art. 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India., and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere and dispossess the Petitioner from his possession of Agriculture land in an extent of Ac. 3.66 Cents in Sy.No. 23/2 , Manubolu village and Mandal, Nellore District under the program of Navaratnalu and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the land in an extent of Ac.
3.66 Cents in Sy.No. 23/2 , Manubolu village and Mandal, Nellore District., pending disposal of above Writ petition., and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order granted on 24-06-2020 passed in I.A.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 10639 of 2020 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his possession of agricultural land in an extent of Ac.3.66 cents in Sy.No.23/2, Manubolu village and mandal, Nellore District under the programme of Navaratnalu for allotment of house sites without issuing any acquisition notification or followed due process of law as directed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P. No.4885 of 2008 dated 26.11.2019. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 23.09.2025 submits that the subject land was placed in the prohibited list and it was not used earlier for any public purpose for the above said welfare scheme. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondents are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.3.66 cents in Sy.No.23/2, Manubolu village and mandal, Nellore District strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose. The written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 23.09.2025 shall be made as part of the court record. 4
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 NNN