DALCHAND @ DABBU SON OF KISHANVEER @ KISHORE v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11845/2025 · 2025-10-30
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47731 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47731 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43460] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11845/2025 Dalchand @ Dabbu Son Of Kishanveer @ Kishore, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Badh Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg ( Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh Mr. Anil Agrawal for Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 30/10/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 46/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 85,80(2), 61(2) and 238b BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that marriage was solemnized on 23.05.2024. It is further submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 04.04.2025.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that alleged incident took place after six months of the marriage i.e. on
[2025:RJ-JP:43460] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11845/2025]
06.03.2025. It is further submitted that cremation ceremony was on 06.03.2025 at 09.00 PM and all evidences were erased out.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant death of the victim occurred on 06.03.2025 and the cremation ceremony was done immediately before arriving the family of the victim; that the alleged incidence took place within a short span of six months of the marriage and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant, at this stage.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /44