APHC010507032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26183/2025 Between: 1. ANKIREDDYPALLE ADINARAYANA REDDY, S/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O D.NO.2/35, LEKKAVARIPALLE, GANJIKUNTA, S.MYDUKURU MANDAL, YSR.DISTRICT. 2 2. BHAIRAVA NADHA REDDY, . S/O ADINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O D.NO.2/35, LEKKAVARIPALLE, GANJIKUNTA, S.MYDUKURU MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYDUKURU URBAN POLICE STATION YSR DISTRICT. 4. 4. SIDDAVATAM SIVA LALITHA, W/O BHADRINATH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.7/8/1, N.CHIKKEPPALLI VILLAGE ADIKE MANDAL, NETURU POST, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. ANKIREDDIPALLI ABBIREDDY, S/O A. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O LEKKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, MYDUKURU 2 MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, as well as harassing the petitioners by summoning them to the police station to settle the dispute in favor of the unofficial respondent, and threatening them with false cases if they fails to comply, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3RD Respondent to cease any interference in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents and to refrain from harassing or threatening the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26183 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, as well as harassing the petitioners by summoning them to the police station to settle the dispute in favor of the unofficial respondent and threatening them with false cases if they fails to comply, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to cease any interference in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents and to refrain from harassing or threatening the petitioners, and to pass….” 2. Heard Sri Pilli Sundeep, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are calling the petitioners to the police station and interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaint made by the respondent No.4, the petitioners were called to the police station; however, no crime has been registered against the petitioners. The police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 5. Sri Pilli Sundeep, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.09.2025 SNI 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26183 of 2025 Dated.23.09.2025 SNI 83