[2025:RJ-JP:42930] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12021/2025 Rakesh Gadhwal S/o Ratanlal Gadhwal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 574/34, Gadhwal Bhawan, Garhi-Maliyan, Jons-Ganj, District Ajmer - 305001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Board Of Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred with following prayer:- (i) the impugned advertisement dated 25.10.2024 for the post of School Lecturer (School Education) wherein the petitioner are again been considered as not eligible on the premise of being overage while not implementing and applying the Impugned Notification dated 23.09.2022 to be held to be illegal and arbitrary; (ii) The respondents by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof may kindly be directed to:- a. The Petitioner shall be considered to be eligible for appointment on the post of School Lecturer (School Education) in pursuance to the advertisement dated 25.10.2024; b. The Petitioner shall be granted appointment on the post of School Lecturer (various subjects) in pursuance [2025:RJ-JP:42930] (2 of 2) [CW-12021/2025] to the advertisement dated 25.10.2024 with all consequential benefits and seniority. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the matter requires consideration by the respondents in light of the policies adopted from time to time, considering circumstances prevailing in previous years which includes pandemic Covid-19 duration and problems faced in conducting recruitment between two recruitment process for the same post, therefore, it is appropriate to permit a detailed representation claiming the benefit under the policy as adopted by the Government in identical circumstances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 4. With aforesaid, instant writ petition with pending application(s), if any stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /03