[2025:RJ-JP:48360] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8153/2024 1. Ashok Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramkalyan Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ravasa, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 2. Hemraj Gurjar Son Of Shri Prabhudayal Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Badnwal, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Forest, Govt. Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest, Bharatpur Rajasthan. 3. The Deputy Conservator Of Forest, Samajik Vaniki, Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 4. The Regional Forest Officer, Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Gouttam Mr. G.S. Gouttam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditaya Singh, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Learned counsel, Mr. Aditaya Singh, Dy. GC accepts notice for respondents. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:48360] (2 of 3) [CW-8153/2024] “a) The action of respondents may kindly be declare illegal by which respondents not paid the salary of petitioners as per the minimum wages Act and equivalent to regular forest guard/forest friend as per the Principal laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Jagjeet Singh (supra); b) The Hon’ble Court may kindly be directed to respondents to regularize the service of petitioners by adopting/consider his candidature under Rule, 2022 by issuing appointing order and creating regular post which is created for the other employee c) Further may kindly be directed to the respondents to not replace the petitioners from another set-up of contractual/temporary employee through placement agency or direct contractual employee and allow to continue him on the said post;” 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decison, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the [2025:RJ-JP:48360] (3 of 3) [CW-8153/2024] petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /322