Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47722 (AP)

Lingam Shyam Sunder Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18132/2020 · 2025-09-24

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010274582020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 18132/2020 Between: 1. LINGAM SHYAM SUNDER RAO, S/O VENKATA PADMARAJU AGE 80 YEAR,OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,AMAEAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DSITRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPTNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his settlement patta land bearing No.3308/2 in Sy.No.368/3 (old Sy.No.356, 358 and 359) to an extent of Ac.3.60 cents situated at Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for the purpose of Navaratnalu scheme without notice to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his settlement patta land mentioned above for Navaratnalu scheme without following due process of law, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his settlement patta land bearing No.3308/2 in Sy.No.368/3 (old Sy.No.356, 358 & 359) to an extent of Ac.3.60 cents situated at Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for Navaratnalu scheme without following due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the Proposed Implead petitioner herein as Respondent No. 4 in W.P.No.18132 of 2020, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHU SUDHAN P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner died and no cause survives in this writ petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 25.09.2025 LSP 239 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 18132/2020 25.09.2025 LSP