Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 13 of 2025
Shiv Pal
...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
...Respondent
Present:- Mr. Prem Kaushal, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.0826 of 2020, under Sections 302, 307, 504, 506 and 34 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.1577 of 2021, was rejected on 13.01.2023. The second bail application, being BA2 No.352 of 2023, was also rejected on
29.11.2023.
4.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co- accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail.
5.
This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.
6.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7.
The bail application is allowed.
2
8.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
07.04.2025 Ravi Bisht