SMT R DEEPA D/O LATE R TIPPESWAMI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CCC/100030/2025 · 2025-03-24
C M Poonacha, S G Pandit
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47717 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47717 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5412-DB CCC No. 100030 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100030 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SMT. R. DEEPA D/O. LATE R. TIPPESWAMI, AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. KULMI BAZAR, MULANGI SANJEEVAPPA ROAD, WARD NO.12, BALLARI-583101. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI V.P. VADAVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI-583101. 2. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, CITY CORPORATION, BALLARI-583101. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) CITY CORPORATION, BALLARI-583101. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, LAND RECORDS, BALLARI-583101. 5. THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER, BALLARI CITY SURVEY OFFICE, ATTACHED TO THE ADLR OFFICE, BALLARI-583101. 6. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BALLARI, SUB DIVISION BALLARI, BALLARI-583101. 7. THE TAHASHILDAR, BALLARI TALUK, BALLARI, BALLARI-583101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVT. ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5412-DB CCC No. 100030 of 2025
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO, PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 22/09/2022 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P. NO.103739/2022 VIDE ‘ANNEXURE-B’ IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)
The present contempt proceedings are filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 22.09.2022 passed in WP No.103739/2022. 2. The learned Single Judge vide impugned order dated 22.09.2022, passed in WP No.103739/2022, while ordering for issuance of notice has directed respondent No.2 – the Municipal Commissioner, City Corporation, Ballari not to precipitate the matter till the next date of hearing pursuant to notices – Annexures - A and A1. It is forthcoming that the interim relief sought for in the writ petition is for stay of the notices dated 08.07.2022 and 20.08.2022 (Annexures-A and A1)
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5412-DB CCC No. 100030 of 2025
3. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent authority has removed the boundary stones in the subject land in violation of the order dated 22.09.2022.
The interim order dated 22.09.2022 directing the matter not to precipitate is required to be construed as retailing to proceedings initiated vide the notices dated 08.07.2022 and 20.08.2022 (Annexueres-A and A1) to the writ petition and not regarding any other aspects. 4. In view of the same, there is no disobedience of the orders of this Court as is sought to be alleged in the contempt petition. Hence, the present contempt proceedings are dropped. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
Vmb List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32