[2025:RJ-JP:48615] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 15257/2025 Ramlal @ Kachchha S/o Shri Rodu, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Village Sirohi, Police Station Naraina, District Jaipur At Present Behind Ammas Quarter, Kokawas, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur South. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantnu Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/12/2025 1. The instant third bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 791/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Section 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. It is also contended that the first bail application of the accused-petitioner was dismissed with the liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet and charge-sheet has already been filed. The learned Trial Court vide order dated 14.11.2025, dismissed the [2025:RJ-JP:48615] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15257/2025] bail application of the petitioner solely on the grounds that the petitioner is having criminal antecedents. It is also contended that the alleged theft was committed on 30.07.2025, however, the recovery of stolen diesel was made from the joint information furnished by the petitioner and other co-accused after four days from the date of incident from an open land. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the third bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the third bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 19 cases have been registered under various offences including theft, robbery, excise Act etc., therefore, the third bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the third bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ramlal @ Kachchha S/o Shri Rodu, in connection with FIR No. 791/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- [2025:RJ-JP:48615] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15257/2025] each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/Shruti/17