Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47714 (RAJ)

SHRI PAWAN KHANNA S/O LATE SHRI NANAK CHAND KHANNA v. SHRI SIDHARTH MAHAJAN, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAIPUR

CCP/1673/2018 · 2025-11-06

Uma Shanker Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44449] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1673/2018 Shri Pawan Khanna S/o Late Shri Nanak Chand Khanna, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Subhash Chowk, Village Naryana, Tehsil Phulera, Panchayat Samiti Dudu, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Sidharth Mahajan, The District Collector Jaipur, Collectorate, Jaipur. 2. The Additional District Collector (Ii) And Officer In-Charge Vigilance, Collectorate, Jaipur. 3. Shri Virendra Singh Yadav, Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub- Division Office, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. 4. Shri Narayan Singh, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Dudu, District Jaipur. 5. Vishvanath Pareek, Secretary, Gram Panchayat Maraina, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur. 6. State Of Rajasthan Through District Collector, Collectorate Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Tiwari, Adv. & Ms. Neha Swami, Adv. for Mr. Sandeep Saxena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. G S Gill, AAG. with Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 06/11/2025 ,l-ch- flfoy fjV fiVh'ku uacj 4036@2017 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 09-05-2017 dh dfFkr vogsyuk ds laca/k esa ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h gSA vkns'k dk lqlaxr Hkkx fuEukuqlkj gS%& "The parties were directed to fined out solution and during pendency of the writ petition, the restriction was even imposed for closing the gate other than between 11 PM to 5 AM. It was, however, with arrangement to open the gate as and when [2025:RJ-JP:44449] (2 of 2) [CCP-1673/2018] somebody intends to use the public way. The allegation exists that Watchman refused to open the gate. To monitor the aforesaid, suggestion has been given by the Government Counsel to put a CCTV Camera and accordingly, sanction has also been given for the aforesaid. Accordingly, this writ petition is dispose fo with the following directions: (i) The gate should not be obstruction for use of Gaurav Path. If gate is closed during night hours, it should be between 11 PM to 5 AM. During the intervening period of 6 hours given therein also, it should be opened as and when somebody wants to acess the public way subject to his identification, if so required, for the safety purpose. (ii) A CCTV Camera should be installed so as to monitor compliance of the direction given above. The CCTV Camera would be maintained by the Government at their cost." fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd xsV ij tks lhlhVhoh dSejs yxk;s x;s Fks] os orZeku esa dke ugha dj jgs gSa tks U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa dh vogsyuk gSA tcfd foi{kh dh vksj ls fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk us tokc ds leFkZu esa 'kiFki= izLrqr dj vkns'k dh ikyuk dk dFku fd;k gS] yxk;s x;s vkjksi fujk/kkj gksuk crkrs gq, ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;s x;s nLrkostksa] ;kfpdk o tokc esa of.kZr rF;ksa ls Li"V gS fd U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh ikyuk dh tk pqdh Fkh] ysfdu orZeku le; esa lhlhVhoh dSejs [kjkc gksus vFkok ugha gksus ds laca/k esa fookn gS] U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh tkucw>dj vogsyuk o voekuuk dk iz'u fyIr ugha gSA vkns'k esa ;g Hkh funsZ'k fn;k x;k Fkk fd nksuksa i{k cSBdj o vkilh leUo; ls dksbZ lek/kku fudkysA laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa dh tkucw>dj vogsyuk dk rF; Li"V ugha gS] vr% ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkrh gSA foi{khx.k dks tkjh'kqnk uksfVl lekIr fd;s tkrs gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /29