Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47713 (RAJ)

HARISH KUMAR JANGID S/O LATE SHRI HANUMAN SAHAY JANGID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16118/2024 · 2025-11-11

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45214] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16118/2024 Harish Kumar Jangid S/o Late Shri Hanuman Sahay Jangid, Aged About 42 Years, R/o K018, Rameshwar Dham W Bad Pipali, Sikar Road, Jaipur. ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Mr. Giriraj Prasad Gurjar for Mr. Sanjay Sharma Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Dr. V.B. Sharma with Mr. Anindya Gupta Mr. Harshit Tiwari HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 547/2024 registered at Police Station Bagru District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide an order dated 12.03.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant subject to the condition that applicant joins and co-operate during the investigation. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the applicant has duly joined the investigation. It is further submitted that the matter at hand is civil in nature and the parties were engaged in a business of manufacturing of flour and there was a business transaction, [2025:RJ-JP:45214] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16118/2024] wherein both the complainant and the victim were actively involved. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the instant bail application and submitted that the applicant has strong criminal antecedents and has been actively involved in similar transactions in the past as well, wherein breaches of contract have also been reported, as per the factual report on record. It is further submitted that the applicant is the habitual offender and has carried out various frauds by entering into similar contracts without fulfilling the agreed terms. It is further submitted that the applicant is not at all co-operative with the investigating authorities during the course of investigation. 4. Having heard the contentions put-forth by the learned counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicant has already joined investigation as directed vide an interim order dated 12.03.2025; that prima facie matter is civil in nature and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 12.03.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Bagru District Jaipur (West) in F.I.R. No. 547/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Harish Kumar Jangid S/o Late Shri Hanuman Sahay Jangid shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the [2025:RJ-JP:45214] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16118/2024] S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/223