CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----21561 21561 21561 21561 250 250 250 250 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Satish Kumar Sharma State of Punjab and others CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present: Present: Present: Present:- SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL 2. PPS, Deputy Superintendent of P relevant whereof reads thus: petitioner has leveled false allegations against the official respondents. petitioner as alleged in the application as well as in the present petition. petitioner in the petition. 21561 21561 21561 21561----2025 2025 2025 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CRM CRM CRM CRM---- Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Satish Kumar Sharma versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Additional AG Punjab. Mr. Piyush Setia, Advocate for respondent No.6. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition read thus: “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and the respondents may kindly be directed not to harass the petitioner at the instance of private respondents action as per application dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P the life and liberty of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. Reply by way of an affidavit dated 07.05.2025 of Balkar Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police (D) relevant whereof reads thus: “6. That it is respectfully 02.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) alleged moved by petitioner to respondent no.2 was never received in the office of respondent no petitioner has leveled false allegations against the official respondents. The official respondents never harassed petitioner as alleged in the application as well as in the present petition. Nothing was happened in the office of respondent no. 4 as alleged by the petitioner in the petition.” 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH ----M M M M----21561 21561 21561 21561----2025 2025 2025 2025 Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: September 10 September 10 September 10 September 10, 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Additional AG Punjab. Mr. Piyush Setia, Advocate for respondent No.6. The substantive prayer made in the petition read thus: It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and the respondents may kindly be directed not to harass the petitioner at the instance of private respondents for taking the action as per application dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” Reply by way of an affidavit dated 07.05.2025 of Balkar Singh, olice (D) has been filed in the matter, That it is respectfully submitted that the application dated 3) alleged moved by petitioner to respondent no.2 was never received in the office of respondent no.2 and even the petitioner has leveled false allegations against the official respondents. The official respondents never harassed the petitioner nor gave threats to petitioner as alleged in the application as well as in the present petition. appened in the office of respondent no. 4 as alleged by the 1111 .Petitioner s It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and the respondents may kindly be directed not to for taking the and to protect Reply by way of an affidavit dated 07.05.2025 of Balkar Singh, has been filed in the matter, submitted that the application dated 3) alleged moved by petitioner to respondent .2 and even the petitioner has leveled false allegations against the official respondents. the petitioner nor gave threats to petitioner as alleged in the application as well as in the present petition. appened in the office of respondent no. 4 as alleged by the MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.09.10 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----21561 21561 21561 21561----2025 2025 2025 2025 2222 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the above, seeks to withdraw the petition in hand for the present with liberty to revisit this Court by way of a separate petition, in case of occasion so ensues. 4. Dismissed as withdraw, with liberty aforesaid, for the nonce. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE September 10 September 10 September 10 September 10, 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.09.10 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment