Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47706 (AP)

BONTHU GOVINDU v. SRI SIVA PRASAD

CC/2062/2025 · 2025-10-16

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010399882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2062/2025 Between: 1. BONTHU GOVINDU, S/O. B.SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION R/O . PP AGRAHARAM VILLAGE MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 2. BONTHU SURYANARAYANNA, ,S/O. B KOILAYYA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION R/O. PP AGRAHARAM VILLAGE MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI SIVA PRASAD, DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY) DIST.CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. SRI RUTTALA BHUSHAN RAO, , AUTHORISED OFFICER THE MAKAVARAPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT( OLD VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor herein for willfully and deliberately violating the order dated.21.11.2022 and subsequent orders passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.37457/2022 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2. SRINIVAS BASAVA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing Sri M.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Srinivas Basava, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 21.11.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.37457 of 2022. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing Sri M.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Srinivas Basava, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, submitted that the order dated 21.11.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.37457 of 2022 has not been violated. 4. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 17.10.2025 SNI 3 225 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2062/ 2025 Date: 17.10.2025 SNI