KOTA VEHICLE FITNESS CENTER v. SUCHI TYAGI, TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
CCP/1283/2025 · 2025-11-28
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47702 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47702 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48555] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1283/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14075/2025
1. Kota Vehicle Fitness Center, Plot No. E- 516, (A And B) Road No.7, Ipla, Kota, Through Proprietor Mrs. Kirti Agarwal W/o Sh. Lovnish Agarwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bisaytiyon Ka Mohalla, Bagru Rawan, Bagru, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Vatsal Enterprises, Near Rto Office, N.h. 8, Sahapura, District Jaipur Through Proprietor Lalit Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Madan Lal Gupta, Aged 40 Years, R/o 15, Vidhyak Nagar, Behind Jyoti Nagar, Police Station Lal Kothi, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Suchi Tyagi, Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport And Road Safety, Jaipur.
2. Jagdish Bairwa, Additional Transport Commissioner (Rules), Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 28/11/2025
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging contempt of interim order dated 16.09.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14075/2025.
[2025:RJ-JP:48555] (2 of 2) [CCP-1283/2025]
2. At the outset, learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has filed compliance report today itself along with
order dated 28.11.2025, whereby in compliance of interim order dated 16.09.2025 passed by this Court, subject to final decision of the above writ petition, online I.D. of the petitioners has been activated.
3. It is expected from the respondents that pursuant to the order dated 28.11.2025, they will permit operation of I.D. of the petitioners.
4. In view of above, the contempt petition is disposed of.
5. Notices stand discharged.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /152