Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.16332 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.16332 of 2025 Thangavel Sankar ... Petitioner
Vs. 1. The District Collector, NH-40, Ranipet Collector Office, Ranipet District, Ranipet - 632 401. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, W8FM+HF3, Krishnagiri Trunk Road, Ranipet - 632 401. 3. The Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Keezhkupam Village, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipettai District - 631 003. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for an issuance of writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in his original post as Village Assistant, based on his earlier appointment and direct the respondents to take appropriate action in light of the representation made by the petitioner and his wife and any other relief. Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16332 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.M.G.B.Jeyakumar For Respondents : Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 ORDER The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in his original post as Village Assistant based on his earlier appointment and direct the respondents to take appropriate action in light of the representation made by the petitioner and his wife. 2. The case of the petitioner is that, due to matrimonial dispute, he did not attend the office since 2011. However, no termination order has been issued. Hence, he sent a representation to the respondents to permit him to continue his job. However, the said representation was rejected vide letter dated 05.09.2024. Hence the instant writ petition has been filed. 3. It is apparent on the face of the record that the petitioner was absent from duties since 2011 and he woke up only after 14 years and sent representation during 2022 seeking reinstatement. Such conduct of the petitioner is not appreciable. Therefore, this Court do not find any merits in the writ petition. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16332 of 2025 In the result, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. 20.06.2025
veda Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No To
1. The District Collector, NH-40, Ranipet Collector Office, Ranipet District, Ranipet - 632 401. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, W8FM+HF3, Krishnagiri Trunk Road, Ranipet - 632 401. 3. The Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. 4.
The Village Administrative Officer, Keezhkupam Village, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipettai District - 631 003. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.16332 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. veda W.P.No.16332 of 2025
20.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis